ZHU Junhui, HUANG Zikang, ZHOU Wei, et al
Journal of Clinical Radiology.
2023, 42(9):
1447-1452.
Objective To evaluate the correlation between metabolic parameters calculated by different SUV thresholds on 18F-FDG PET/CT with TNM staging for non-small cell lung cancer. Methods The data of 84 pathologically proven non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT examination were retrospectively analyzed.Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax)was measured,and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated by three methods :the absolute SUV threshold method (MTVp and TLGp, p= 2.5,3,4); the fixed% SUVmax threshold method (MTVq% and TLGq%,q = 40,50),and the adaptive iterative algorithm method(ALA) (MTVALA and TLGALA).The differences of parameters between TNM stage and the correlation between parameters and TNM stage were analyzed.The ROC curves evaluated the value of each parameter in predicting lymph node metastasis. Results All metabolic parameters were significantly different among T、N stage groups(P<0.05 for all).MTVALA,TLGALA,MTV2.5,TLG2.5,MTV3,MTV40%,TLG40%,MTV50% were significantly different between M stage groups(P<0.05 for all),but SUVmax、TLG3、MTV4、TLG4、TLG50% were not(P>0.05 for all).The correlation between SUVmax and T stage was positively moderate(r=0.529,P<0.001).The correlation between all metabolic parameters calculated by different SUV thresholds,and T stage was positively good(r=0.701-0.772,P<0.001 for all),and TLG2.5 showed the most remarkable relationship(r=0.772,P<0.05).The correlation between All metabolic parameters and N stage was positively fair(r=0.320-0.398,P<0.05 for all).MTVALA,TLGALA,MTV2.5,TLG2.5,MTV3,MTV40%,TLG40%,MTV50% were fairly positively correlated with M stage(r=0.219-0.262,P<0.05 for all),but SUVmax、TLG3、MTV4、TLG4、TLG50% were not(P>0.05 for all).All metabolic parameters had important value for the evaluation of lymph node metastasis.The best diagnostic efficiency was TLG2.5(AUC=0.749,95%CI:0.629-0.869),but the difference was not significant(Z=0.023-0.934,P>0.05 for all).The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of TLG2.5 were 85.7%,55.9% and 69.4%,respectively. Conclusion All metabolic parameters calculated by different SUV thresholds are closely correlated with clinical stage,which are more relevant than SUVmax.In addition,TLG2.5 shows the most remarkable relationship,suggesting great value for clinical setting.